![]() ![]() Planes themselves are middle ground - okay speed, decent health. unreliable against DDs and maneuvering targets. Dive bombers can smack pretty much everything you come across, but accuracy nerfs made them. Torps are solid, short arming distance, decent damage. Alternative are TiTs - Tiny Tims, massive rockets with fcukhueg penetration at 68mm and damage close to BB projectile, but very few in numbers, making them prone to RNG trolling. Decent rockets, though tier 8 and 10 have horrendous disperion on HVAR (multiple small rockets), though can damage plenty of targets with 32mm HE pen. This is a "fleet carrier" that could get sniped by the likes of Saipan, even.USN are versatile hammer - you can spank pretty much every ship type with every kind of payload at your disposal. Without knowing her reticles or seeing her plane speed in action it's hard for me to gauge. ![]() It's easy to judge a ship on paper stats alone, but they don't tell the full story. This is how I feel about her right now as well, but the proof is in the pudding. Nice addition for history's sake, but she just doesn't catch my eye. Yeah, not particularly interested in this one, personally. She will get sniped in those matchups unless you can find some friendly AA. ![]() She matches up horribly vs Pobeda/Chkalov. Like you said in the video, seems to be a theme. But once again, another CV introduc ed with limited/no effectiveness vs DD's. Granted Aquila has a crap-load of them, so maybe it'll be better. Too reliant on specific scenarios to be useful. ![]() AP rockets haven't really been a super big problem, as I see very few German CV's nowadays. Very reliant on specific targets being present, and likely alone. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |